Since 1960 P.J. Peters has developed several inventions in different areas. In 1982, P.J. Peters and MLJP Peters started their collaboration in invention development. PetersInvent is only concerned with product improvement and innovation. PetersInvent is not a producer or manufacturer.
From 1960 to 1962, P.J. Peters worked on the development of a new hydraulic coupling. Change: The possibility to reach the highest torque in the drive shaft by means of hydraulics. On 30 May 1962, patent applications were submitted in:
Switzerland, no. 6735/62, 22-09-’62
Germany, no. P 30 215 XII/47h, 16-10-’62
France, no. 912 453, 24-09-’62
England, no. 36 225 and 03-08-’62
USA, no. 214 682.
The first patent 19-08-1963 was registered in France under number 1 338 617. Because of the high cost of patent application and prototype construction, this project had to be stopped halfway.
From 1960 to 1961, P.J. Peters worked in Switzerland at Kern AG in Aarau. In Switzerland, they worked in a team to develop a special exposure meter for a Hasselblatt camera. This camera was sent into space with a rocket to take close-up images of the moon, which did not yet exist at that time. Nobody knew much about the lighting conditions in space. It was therefore necessary to develop an exposure meter with a very wide range. The exposure meter was meant to control the diaphragm by means of a mechanical coupling. When P.J. Peters was employed, they had already partly finished building the exposure meter. According to P.J. Peters, it was too susceptible to failure and had too many parts. P.J. Peters largely revised the whole design, which was a success.
The Ranger program was a series of unmanned space missions by the United States in the 1960s whose objective was to obtain the first close-up images of the surface of the Moon.
From 1963 to 1965, P.J. Peters repaired cameras for AGFA. He did this in the evenings, after his work at the Catholic University of Nijmegen. Many cameras suffered from the same defects. On those points P.J. Peters has made improvements, which were subsequently incorporated in the production line by AGFA.
In a later period P.J. Peters also repaired other brands of photo cameras.
Between 1963 and 1968, P.J. Peters was employed by the Catholic University of St Radboud in Nijmegen, as an instrument maker. During this period he was able to make several new successful developments and inventions, which were later taken into production.
In 1965 there were quite a few institutions that had problems with projecting and quick-searching information on microfilm / microfiche.
A microfiche is a card made of transparent film used to store printed information in miniaturized form. Each microfiche can accommodate from 48 pages to as much as 152 pages of A4 size. To read the card, a user places it under the lens of a reader machine, which magnifies it greatly. The thinness and small size of the film enables it to be stored very easily and efficiently, allowing libraries, museums and businesses to increase their resource collections without the need for additional storage space.
At that time, P.J. Peters was working as freelance photo camera repair technicion for a photographer who had a camera shop in Nijmegen. The photographer was approached by the university, they were looking for a user-friendly and affordable system to read the information on microfilm. From 1966 to 1968 P.J. Peters developed the Proti Micro Reader.
The first patent 6712324 filed on September 8, 1967 Inquiry number: NL19670012324, inventor P.J. Peters. Unfortunately the photographer used his own name as inventor when he made the patent application.
Other countries where a patent was requested are France, Germany, Switzerland, Belgium.
At that time, there were negotiations with 25 countries that had considerable interest in the Micro Reader. Later many companies, institutions, hospitals and libraries from around the world started to use the Micro Reader.
There was a lot of interest from companies such as Kodak, AGFA, 3M COMPAGNY and Océ van der Grinten who all wanted to take over this invention. Even now, so many years later, companies are still selling these Micro Readers.
In 1976, P.J. Peters invented a new transport system for super 8 and standard 8 film projectors. This made it possible to play images back and forth at variable speed and could be operated manually and with infrared. The German patent was filed on 25-08-1977 and was granted on 31-05-1979 under number 27 38 276, inventor Peters, Paulus Jacobus. Requested by Robert Bosch GmbH, 7000 Stuttgart.
In 1987, P.J. Peters invented the first Super 8 widescreen projector and film camera. The existing film camera and projector were modified by P.J. Peters to record and play movies on widescreen (cinema) format. (Article in Smalfilmen Als Hobby, 07-01-1987).
During the 1970s cancer researchers were focused upon finding a solution to the issues surrounding the separation of red and white blood cells. At the time, available procedures couldn’t keep the cells separated long enough for proper research as automatic analyses were time-consuming.
Approached by academics at Radboud Hospital Nijmegen, P.J. Peters developed the Micro Ultra Centrifuge late 70s. Operating max. at 6.000 rpm, the innovative design of the Micro Ultra Centrifuge made research on individual blood cells possible for the first time in history a major breakthrough in cancer research. See page 2 PDF of the article: A New Disaggregation Device 1984.
In an act of true altruism, when failures to uphold agreements and rights arose between the stakeholders, P.J. Peters, realising the importance of the Micro Ultra Centrifuge for mankind, decided to donate his innovation to the Wilhelmina Cancer Foundation in the Netherlands.
In 1978, P.J. Peters came up with the idea of developing an accurate fuel flow meter for cars. This innovation was prompted by the oil crisis and ‘car-free Sundays’ in the Netherlands and Belgium from November 1973 to January 1974.
From 1978 to 1979, P.J. Peters invented his first working Flow Meter.
At the end of 1997, a prototype flow meter was developed to accurately indicate the fuel consumption of vehicles every second. This flow meter was primarily intended to register the gasoline consumption in cars. By directly confronting the diver with their driving style, they are able to adjust their driving style to their gasoline consumption. This allows cars and lorries to become more than 12% more fuel efficient. Drivers will immediately see when they are driving most efficiently by applying more or less throttle or changing gears at the right time. All fuel first flows through the flow meter. The mechanically constructed flow meter continuously measures the fuel consumption. It cannot be cheated with.
Whether it is cold or hot, driving uphill or downhill, short or long drives, the actual fuel consumption is continuously recorded by the flow meter.
Due to the light construction of the rotor 0.004 grams, which has a peak frequency of maximum 36.900 rotations per minute at 2 L/min. the fluid can be measured and dosed very accurately. In the housing, the fluid (liquid or gas) is swirled. The rotor in the housing is rotated by the swirled fluid. By counting the number of rotations, a reading can be obtained, which is representative of the amount of fluid that flowed through the meter.
This prototype was not yet ready for production. with this prototype it was possible to test in cars. Making a prototype ready for production, suitable for mass production is a completely different story. This requires specialist knowledge and innovative adjustments to achieve this in terms of production technology. Newspaper article De Gelderlander March 3, 1983; “This will be a gold mine”
Research has shown that the flow meter has many more useful applications. It consists of plastic parts, with some electronics for detection of the rotor.
The first three generations of rotor Flow Meters are still being sold today, after more than 35 years, for different applications around the world.
In 1978, P.J. Peters develop the first generation Flow Meter.
The Dutch patent was filed on 21-12-1979 under No. 7909271, and was granted on 10-06-1980, patent no. NL 8003374.
The European patent was granted on 09-04-1986, Publication No. 0 031 629 A1
The U.S. Patent was assigned on 02-08-1983, No. 4,395,919. Inventor P.J. Peters
The flat rotor of the 1st generation flow meter shows a “lagging effect”. Later, a rotor was developed with three straight blades. The first rotor blade now has three openings instead of one.
These openings cause an interruption of the infrared signal while rotating, generating three pulses per rotation. The new construction of the rotor weighs 0.004 grams. Whith a peak frequency of 24.000 rotations at 2 L/min per minute. the fluid can be measured and dosed very accurately.
In 1984, P.J. Peters develop the second generation Flow Meter.
The big difference between the 1st generation and 2nd generation flow meter is the design of the rotor blades and housing of the electronics. The three blades of the 2nd generation rotor are curved, allowing for a more effective contact with the fluid. The housing for the photo cells is constructed differently than in the first generation flow meter. Due to the super-light construction of the rotor 0.005 gram, which has a peak frequency of maximum 81.800 rotations per minute at 4 L/min. The fluid can be measured and dosed very accurately.
First, the Swiss patent was requested on 12-12-1985. The patent was granted on 15-02-1989, No. CH 669 039 A5.
The European patent was granted on 15-07-1987, Publication No. 0 228 577 A1
The U.S. patent was granted on 29-03-1988, No. 4,733,570. Inventor P.J. Peters
In 1990, P.J. Peters develop the third generation Flow Meter.
On 16-11-1990 a European patent was filed. The European patent was granted on 29-6-1994, Publication No. 0 485 684 A1. Inventor P.J. Peters.
The first and second generation flow meters have a housing, rotor and a worm. Those three components form the heart of the flow meter.
The housing contains a narrow bridge with a bearing hole in the middle. First, the rotor is positioned in the bearing hole of the housing part. At the end of the worm there is another bearing hole. Finally the worm is carefully pushed into the housing part. At the same time, the rotor shaft should be positioned in the bearing hole of the worm. The assembly is a very precise job. In the third generation flow meter, the housing and flow guides form one piece. The flow guides are not spiral shaped like in the first and second generation flow meters, but straight with an angled tip. This generation also requires the rotor to be mounted manually. The rotor and the shafts are inserted in a bearing hole of the housing and into a bearing hole of the stop plate. The bearing hole is in the middle of the stop plate. The round stop plate that is clamped into the housing of the worm will force the fluid to flow into the flow guides at the last moment, causing the fluid to swirl.
For the first time, we used a PCB on which the photocells and other components were automatically mounted with a pick-and-place system.
The assembly of the rotor is still a precise and time-consuming job in the third generation flow meter.
The first three generations of flow meters with a rotor are not suitable for mass production, as their difficult assembly must be done manually.
Although the previous three generation rotor-based flow meters function well in their respective deployment areas, there are a number of limitations.
Due to these restrictions, we are developing a fourth generation flow meter. In order to improve the limitations, we have developed a completely new construction based on a ball.
Each time we face the challenge of improving our products by designing new constructions that offer more benefits. Another important goal we set ourselves is that the new developments must be patentable. Our strength is that we build the prototypes ourselves, as they would be made using mould technology.
Just as every car manufacturer introduces new innovations to the market every year, we are also constantly working on new developments, not just regarding flow meters but in a number of areas. We come up with solutions and our strength is the innovative design of new applications. New developments are essential to humanity and our future and will never stop.
Flowmeters based on a rotor are highly sensitive to dirt particles. The slightest contamination and air bubbles can cause the relatively light rotor to get stuck. As a result, flow meters based on a rotor can only be used for very clean liquids. This is a huge limitation for the various application areas for liquids where flow meters are desirable.
Good filter systems are expensive and need to be replaced regularly. Another drawback is that filter systems increase the resistance in a conduit. As the dirt in a filter accumulates, the resistance in the pipe also increases. Therefore, filters must be regularly replaced or cleaned, which is costly. The system must be opened to replace the filter, which is not conducive to certain processes. As a consequence, the production process will temporarily come to a standstill.
Another major disadvantage of flow meters with a rotor is that the rotor must be manually assembled. The thin shaft of the rotor must be mounted very carefully in the small holes of the bearings, which can only be done manually. When it comes to producing large numbers, this is time-consuming and expensive work. Sterile assembly of the rotor and the rest of the components, e.g. for the pharmaceutical industry, is not possible in automated production.
Companies that do not develop further come to a standstill and will not survive in this new competitive society. Our strongest side, through years of experience, is that we are able to improve and adapt flow meters for specific purposes.
NL1013231 (C2) 2001-04-09 Inventor MLJP Peters
The fourth generation flow meter is constructed in a completely different way. We succeeded in constructing a very accurate flow meter that is no longer susceptible to contaminated liquids. This greatly increases the applicability of the flow meter.
Due to this new construction, the assembly time is considerably shortened to just a few seconds. Because of its simplicity, the assembly can be fully automated to produce large numbers.
The rotor has been replaced by a ball. The first test results are amazing, as seen on 
at 3.40 minutes in which a pipeline full of sand flows through the flow meter smoothly and completely.
When the sand has passed the flow meter, the ball continues to rotate without problems. This is possible due to the new ball-based construction. This test is heavily exaggerated, but the results are amazing.
After some time I came up with new ideas to improve the first version of the fourth generation flow meter. This resulted in the second patent application of the fourth generation: a new constructed ball-based flow meter.
Technical developments will never stop. This also applies to flow meters. Inventors will always strive for continuous innovation. When the product has been brought to market, new ideas will be developed. The possibilities of the fourth generation flow meter are an example of this.
WO2015065187 (A1) 2015-05-07 Inventor MLJP Peters
Uploading a video of this flow meter on suddenly generated a lot of interest in this innovation. Because of this video, I received a lot of response from interested companies around the world. Companies I could never have reached otherwise. Judging by the many applications, there appears to be a high demand for a flow meter with these renewed properties.
The many comments on YouTube prompted me to develop and improve the second version by making new adjustments. One of the big differences is that the 3rd version flow meter does not have a cage construction.
